FREE FALL OF OIL PRICES AND INDIA



On 27th November 2014, a meeting was conducted in Vienna by the OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) to decide on whether to cut the production of oil in order to support the falling global oil prices. But they were unable to reach into an agreement because of the opposition from Saudi Arabia.

So the first question that has to come to every one’s mind is what is the reason for the recent free fall of global oil prices?

To answer this question, first we have to get an idea about shale oil. Shale oil is unconventional oil produced from oil shale (Oil shale, also known as kerogen shale, is an organic-rich fine-grained sedimentary rock) rock fragments. That means if a country has large amount of oil shale reserves, then it can also produce oil. But the problem is the extraction of oil from oil shale. It is a very complex, capital intensive process and the cost of producing oil is much higher compared to the traditional methods.

US has significant amount of oil shale reserves in their country. Still they didn't produce much oil using this method because of the high costs. But the picture started to change five to six years back. When we consider the oil prices from the period 2010 to 2014 we can see that the price was settled somewhere around $100 per barrel.


This was because of the demand from China and other emerging economies was good and there was some bottlenecks from the supply side because of the political uncertainties from Libya, Iraq etc. This has helped demand to stay always above supply and as a result the price was settled around $100 per barrel for a long period of time.

Price of crude oil WTI. Data obtained from www.nasdaq,com

US energy companies smelled this as an opportunity to extract oil from oil shale. Because they estimated that if the price of the oil is in the $100 range, then even after considering the huge costs associated with the exploration activities, they can still make a decent profit. This insight helped the US energy companies to pump billions of dollars into shale oil production and they have received lot of capital. As a result the share of US in the global oil market has been increased dramatically. US were producing about 4 million barrels of oil per day till 2008. Since then it has been increased to 8.97 million barrels per day at the end of October 2014.

Situation was good till last September. But it started to change from September onwards. Political chaos in many countries started to abate. Libya’s production has recovered from 200,000 barrels a day in April to 900,000 barrels a day, while war hasn’t stopped production in Iraq and output there has risen to an all-time high level of 3.3 million barrels per day. At the same time global economy started to experience some sort of setbacks. Demand from China, which was the growth engine of the past decade got reduced. Similar trends were seen from all over the world. This lower demand coupled with an excess supply from US and other oil producing nations caused the oil price to fall from $100 levels to $65 levels.

The next question is why Saudi Arabia is not ready for a cut in oil production. Because they fear that if OPEC cut production, the price will again climb back to the previous levels and as a result they may lose the competitive edge in the global oil market because of the supply from US. The Bloomberg report written by Grant Smith reports that US is on its path to become the biggest oil producer in the world by overtaking Saudi Arabia (Full report can be read from here http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-04/u-s-seen-as-biggest-oil-producer-after-overtaking-saudi.html)

So Saudi Arabia needs to make the shale oil production in US unviable and unprofitable by making the crude oil price lower. But there is a very serious negative reaction to this. The major source of revenue for most of the biggest oil producing nations is from the oil trade. So if the price continues to hover around these levels, then it is going to have a very tough time for their economies, because they may have set their economic and public policies on the assumption that they will get around $100 per barrel for oil. So the revenue short fall will be huge. 

A report from outside the box (Full article can be accessed from here http://d21uq3hx4esec9.cloudfront.net/uploads/pdf/OTB_Nov_26_2014.pdf) by Jawad Mian says that the current oil decline has potentially cost OPEC $250 billion of its recent earnings of $1 trillion. This explains the magnitude of the situation. At the same time in the same report he shared one interesting observation. Even though 50 percent of shale oil is un-economical at current prices, the median cost of producing shale oil came down to $57 compared to $70 last year.  That means even at these price levels US can produce oil economically. So we are going to see a huge price war in the oil sector in the coming years.

How India will be affected?

Everyone knows that India is a net importer of petroleum products and we imports around 70 percent of our crude requirements. So this price falls going to be very positive for our nation.

Our current account situations will be improved because oil is the biggest contributor of our import bill. Every dollar fall in oil leads to 4000 crore saving for India.

Also this is going to have a positive impact on our inflation front too. According to a RBI report (2005), for every unit dollar increase in crude oil price, WPI inflation rises by 30 basis points. Obviously every unit dollar decrease should also have some positive effects.

Economists around the world predict that this is not a temporary phenomenon. This price level will be maintained in the years to come. For India “acche din aane wale hai” :)

References




When TCS is the cash cow of Tata Sons




Tata consultancy services again came into the lime light last week by announcing a strong first quarter results and becoming the first Indian company to achieve the 5 lakh crore mark in terms of market capitalization. The competitors to TCS such as ONGC, Reliance, ITC etc. (in terms of market cap) are far below the level achieved by TCS. 

So I just wanted to check how much TCS is worth to Tata Sons compared to other Tata group companies.

For that I took 12 major Tata group companies and collected their market cap (for July 24, 2014), Net sales and net profit. (On a consolidated basis as on FY14)

The following interesting facts have been observed.



The combined market cap of 12 Tata group companies are 814,681.81 lakh crore (as on July 24). The biggest contributor is obviously TCS with a whopping 62.2 percent share in total market cap. The next biggest gainer is Tata motors. But its contribution is 19.11 percent almost one third of TCS.

The next thing I considered is the net sales and net profit (in a consolidated basis as on FY 14).



The revenues of 12 major Tata group companies for FY2013-14 was at 562,496.87 crore in which TCS contributed to just 14.83 percent. Tata motors were the biggest contributor with a 41.86 percent share followed by Tata Steel with 26.6 percent. But when we come to net profit scenario, TCS contribution was 51.16 percent of the total net profit (total reported net profit by these companies were 37,787.83 crore as on FY14) reported by these companies. Tata motors secured the second position with 37.32 percent share (But most of its profit and revenue came from JLR) and Tata steel came third with a meager 9.7 percent. Interesting isn’t it? The important factor to consider in this scenario is even though TCS contributed a meager 15 percent to the Tata Group companies’ (that I have considered) revenues; TCS contributed a whopping 51.16 percent share in net profit.

From these figures it is pretty much clear that it is this single IT service company that have enabled Tata Sons to keep investing in group companies. Tata group companies especially Tata steel and Tata motors have huge debt in their books mostly because of the acquisition of JLR by Tata motors and Corus by Tata steel in 2007. The situation got worsened because of the global recession in 2008. Even though the JLR contribute significant amount of bottom line to Tata motors, the performance of Corus is quite disappointing. Even though Tata steel posted a net profit of 3663.90 crore in FY14, it reported a net loss of 7,362.39 crore in the FY13 (in a consolidated basis). Apart from this the recent announcement of Japan’s Docomo to quit the partnership with Tata Tele services which they had in the telecom space and the recent decisions to enter into the aviation sector with Air Asia and Singapore Airlines also need a lot of money. Recently announced dividend payout of Rs. 12750 crore by TCS, the highest ever dividend payout by an Indian company should be seen in this regard. Tata sons will get around 9300 crore from this dividend payout since they have around 74 percent stake in TCS which they can utilize for investment in group companies. 

So TCS is and continues to be the lender of the last resort for Tata group.

Views are personal :)

Data collected from moneycontrol.com, firstpost.com and the respective company websites.

ALL THAT GLITTERS IS NOT GOLD

India’s current account deficit (CAD) for the January-March period narrowed sharply to $1.2 billion (0.2 per cent of GDP) from $18.1 billion (3.6 per cent of GDP) in the same period last year, which was also lower than $4.2 billion (0.9 per cent of GDP) in the October-December quarter of 2013-14.

When we observe the figures of current account deficit, we could easily figure out reduction in current account deficit is mainly attributed to the reduction in gold imports, which amounted to $ 5.30 billion, lower than $15.80 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012-13. Thanks to the measures taken by the UPA government to control the import of gold by increasing the excise duty from 2 to 6 and eventually to 10.

So the question comes to everyone's mind is that is this measure to control the current account deficit by controlling the supply of gold is sustainable? The answer is obviously no. It is pretty much clear that although government has taken stringent measures to control the import of gold, the fantasy of Indian households towards gold as a safe haven to beat inflation has never receded. So the only thing we can do to curb the obsession of gold is not to cut the supply but to curb the underlying demand. How can we achieve that?



In order to find the ways to control the obsession of gold, first we have to consider why people are considering gold as a superior investment vehicle.

Traditionally Indian middle class investors tried and tested the following asset classes

Bank deposits
Equity and equity oriented products
Gold

Most of the people got their fingers burned by investing in equities.

The first reason was that most of the first time investors usually start equity investment at the tip of a bull market. The reason can be attributed to different media that gives much more hype to the stock related news. News like ‘Nifty touched all-time highs, investors wealth multiplied by several times’ obsess first time investors and they take their exposure in equities for the first time on the assumption that equities can deliver superior returns in a short period of time. This euphoria can be seen everywhere. But the investments that they make will be in overvalued stocks because bull markets will stretch the valuations of stocks to unprecedented levels and since they make most of their investments at the peak of a bull market, eventually they will end up in loss as graham said all the bull markets will eventually end in an unjustifiable bear market.

Second reason is that attitude of most of the people is that they need quick profit. While investing in equities they are not considering the fact that investment in equities means investment in companies and the profit won't come in a day or two.

Third reason is even though people have long term financial goals, they are unwilling to take short term losses which are apparent in equities.

Because of all these factors, people consider equity investments as an investment vehicle to lose money. As a result traditional savings methods like gold and bank deposits got much more exposure than it ought to be.

In the last decade especially in the past 4 years, our country has been experiencing stubbornly high inflation. Consumer price index based inflation is somewhere around 8 to 10 percent for the past couple of years. People realized that bank deposits that gave a mere return of around 7 to 9 percent will not be enough to beat the inflation. So the exposure towards gold increased further based on the assumption that gold can give superior returns which is capable of beating the inflation.

So coming to the central topic of this article, how can we curb the demand of gold or more precisely how can we reduce the exposure towards gold in one's portfolio thereby making our balance of payments much more stable? There could be many ways but in my view the most effective way is to encourage people to invest in financial products such as equity and equity oriented products, debt instruments etc. rather than in physical products, teach them about various financial products available, make them aware of the benefits of investing as well as the risk factors involved. Encourage them to save for long term. Also make them aware that investment in equities can generate substantial capital appreciation in the long run. As nation progress everyone should get exposure towards formal financial system. This exposure towards the formal financial system will eventually help people to understand the various asset classes and the benefits of investing in various assets and also the risk involved. So in the long run exposure towards physical assets will reduce marginally and the people will allocate more exposure towards equity. Thus the financial markets of our nation will flourish and it will definitely going help to help our economy in a positive way. I know this is not an easy task and it requires Herculean efforts from concerned departments. But we have to take short term pains for a stronger and incredible nation.

I firmly believe in the long run no asset class can give the returns which equities can give. Take the past 20 or 30 years of data and you will come to know. But past returns does not necessarily mean that it will continue in the future. But as an investor we should and have to believe in a better tomorrow :)

It does not mean that I loathe gold. What I believe is the exposure of gold in our portfolio should not exceed 10 percent of the total portfolio value.


So to conclude curbing demand of gold by cutting down supply is not an option in the long run, even though it may work in the short run. The effective way is to curb the demand itself by making citizens aware of the various financial products apart from gold.

Views are personal :)