Two years of Raghuram Rajan - An ardent follower's perspective

Raghuram Rajan at the World Economic Outlook press conference.WEO Press Conference, Washington DC, IMF Headquarters - photo courtesy - Wikipedia
Raghuram Rajan completes two years as the RBI governor on 04th of September 2015. Rajan is perhaps the only RBI governor who came with international experiences and international qualifications. He has garnered accolades from all quarters. 

The famous Swiss investor Marc Feber described him like this "Mr. Raghuram Rajan is an outstanding man who understands central banking. He is probably only one in the world among the crowds of professors at central banks that actually has a good grip on monetary policies and what you can or cannot achieve with them."

As an ardent follower of Mr. Raghuram Rajan, I think this is the best time to discuss the various policies adopted by RBI under his leadership during the last two years.

Let’s explore this discussion in the following dimensions

1)  What was the prevailing macroeconomic environment when Raghuram Rajan took charge as the central bank governor?

2)  What has been changed in the last two years?

3)     What are the contributions of RBI and Raghuram Rajan towards this change and what can we expect from him in the coming years.

The year 2013 was not a good year for our nation. We were exposed to a lot of vulnerabilities such as political logjam, skyrocketing retail inflation, decade low GDP growth, declining foreign investments, alarming current account deficit, declining savings rate, over investments of people in physical assets such as gold, pessimism in the stock market, declining foreign exchange reserves etc. The decision from the US Federal Reserve to taper their bond buying program, the so called QE3 worked as a strong catalyst to the already vulnerable macro economic situation and the rupee witnessed a free fall, depreciated sharply from 60 odd levels to a record low of below 68 levels as a huge amount of flight of capital materialized.

Rajan took charge as the 23rd and the youngest governor of RBI in this challenging situation. 

I still remember after the announcement of his appointment as the new RBI governor, Rajan said on August 06 2013 that "We do not have a magic wand to make the problems disappear instantaneously, but I have absolutely no doubt we will deal with them" following that in his first speech as the central bank governor he told that his emphasis will be mainly on ensuring sustainability and predictability, drafting the monetary policy by balancing the act between inflation and growth, maintaining exchange rate stability and achieving inclusive development.

All his work in these two years was actually consistent with the statements that he has made in the first speech. Let’s consider the various dimensions one by one

Monetary policy and inflation - Corporate and markets were expecting that the newly appointed governor will cut the policy rates aggressively in order to promote growth and to revive the investment cycle. But in his first monetary policy review, he raised the repo rates from 7.25 percent to 7.5. In the subsequent monetary reviews he again increased it to 7.75 and eventually to 8 percent. This was really a shock to the market. But his intentions were clear. He wanted the retail inflation to come down to reasonable levels because he was certain that in the medium to long run, sustainable growth is possible only if inflation stays at a lower level. He started to reduce the interest rates in January 2015 only after getting clear indication that the CPI inflation came down to controllable levels.

Regulation of public sector banks & tackling the NPA problems - RBI has setup PJ Nayak committee in order to review the governance in bank boards and the committee has recommended several plan of actions such as reducing the government stake in public sector banks to 51 percent, setting up of Bank Investment Company (BIC) and providing BIC the autonomy and voting powers to appoint board of directors in PSBs etc. I believe that these steps if implemented correctly will help to resolve the current operational ineffectiveness of public sector banks and will help them to compete at par with their private sector peers thereby reducing the non performing assets issue. Adding to that RBI has set up CRILIC (Central Repository of Information on Large Credits) database to collect, store and disseminate credit data to lenders in order to bring more transparency towards corporate lending. It is true that it may take time to percolate and show the progress. But these steps can be seen as strong steps towards building a transparent and competitive PSB regime.

Financial inclusion - Financial inclusion can have large and significant effects on our economy considering the fact that almost 50 percent of our population does not have access to formal banking system. Unavailability of formal banking systems make them vulnerable to informal alternatives. The principal approval for 2 banks including IDFC and Bandhan finance with a strict rural banking focus as per the report from Bimal Jalan committee and giving in principle approval for 11 payments banks as per the recommendations from Nachiket Mor committee can be seen as the bold steps towards achieving financial inclusion and thereby achieving inclusive development.

Exchange rate stability and foreign exchange reserve - Rupee became the best performing Asia Pacific currency in 2014 after experiencing the free-fall against dollar in 2013. Our foreign exchange reserves also witnessed dramatic improvements in the last two years and it has been increased to 330 billion from the 250 billion levels. In a nutshell we are very well prepared to face any type of external shocks that may arise from the global front.

In the last two years, a lot of things have changed. We are in a much stable and better position compared to 2013. Our economy is in a very good shape and the GDP growth rate expected to be in the 7.5 to 8 percent as per analysis from various agencies, we have a stable government at the centre, government is focusing on achieving fiscal prudence and trying to reduce the fiscal deficit by 3 percent of GDP by FY18. Our inflation dramatically came down to manageable levels and the current account deficit is in manageable levels, thanks to the falling crude oil prices and commodity prices. Stock markets delivered a stellar performance in the last 2 years giving handful of returns to investors. Investor sentiments have been improved dramatically and we are witnessing good amount of foreign capital inflows. We have strong foreign exchange reserves compared to the 2013 levels and the rupee is more stable compared to other emerging markets currencies. We are better prepared to absorb the unanticipated shocks that may arise from the global economic front.

Of course all the improvements that we are witnessing are the result of the collective efforts made by both RBI and government along with other agencies. Considering all the initiatives and policies taken by RBI and governor we can definitely say that the role of RBI was critical and vital in turning around the macro economic situation of our nation in the last two years.


What can we expect from RBI in the coming days? With the falling commodity prices and retail inflation, there is a lot of room for the further rate cuts in the near future. At the same time transmission of the rate cuts is also very important. Even though RBI has cut repo rates by 75 bps, banks were reluctant to reduce the lending rates in response to that. This is a cause of concern. I think RBI should work with banks to tackle this issue.



When can a nation achieve its optimal growth potential? It’s when the fiscal policy as well as the monetary policy goes hand in hand. Till now the measures taken by RBI towards achieving the long term monetary stability and predictability is laudable. I'm sure that great minds like Raghuram Rajan can steer our nation to greater heights.

Views are personal J Comments always welcome

References

Crash in Chinese Stock Market - Time to create a global framework for a predictable financial system

China – the world’s biggest economy in terms of purchasing power parity and the world’s second largest economy in nominal terms - is going through some serious economic turbulence. Challenging macroeconomic environment, slowing rate of growth and the freefall of Chinese stock market reveal some serious concerns about the viability of the policies adopted by Chinese policymakers over the years to fuel their growth.

What went wrong in China?

The recent boom, bust and the prevailing uncertainty in the Chinese stock market shows how the policy makers can influence, perturb and manipulate the financial system and can create serious repercussions around the globe. The Chinese stock market had witnessed one of the biggest stock market rally (I would rather use the word frenzy) in the history with the Chinese stocks returning more than 150 percent over the last year. The main catalyst for this rally was Margin lending which means borrowing to invest. Margin lending is present in almost every financial system, but what made Chinese stock market unique in this case was the type of investors participating in this borrow and trade fury. Usually margin trading performed by highly experienced institutional investors who deal with millions of money and with almost all the available information access. But in China it was the retail investor’s cup of tea. The vulnerability of the Chinese stock market is best described by Scott Kennedy of the Center for Strategic and International Studies by saying that, “Over a quarter of China's stock market capitalization is now supported through margin financing, turning an equity market into a de facto debt market.”

The forces which directly or indirectly caused this margin lending spree are

1) Fuelling the growth after the 2008 financial meltdown using fiscal and monetary stimulus

The 2008 global financial meltdown witnessed a renewed interest in Keynesian economic ideas. In order to revive the demand and put their economy back on track, governments and central banks across the world started to pump in money heavily through fiscal and monetary stimulus. China also was not an exception. Years of interest rate cuts and fiscal stimulus packages created a lot of money in the system. The pumped money has to go somewhere in the system and eventually a lot of money went into the stock market.

Source – Trading Economics
2) Government’s role in promoting margin lending - China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) allowed people to invest in equities through margin lending route from October 2011 after conducting a pilot program in March 2010. Down the line the government relaxed the rules of margin lending to promote retail participation in the stock market and millions of money pumped into the stock market through brokers and retail investors. The number of retail participants in the market increased from 82.66 million in 08-may-2015 to 92.357 million by 24-july-2015. An interesting fact is that nearly two third of people who involved in margin trading (which required a lot of experience and insights) did not complete even the high school degree. As more people took part in this stock buying frenzy, Between June 2014 and June 2015, the amount of officially sanctioned margin trading in the Chinese stock market ballooned from 403 billion yuan to 2.2 trillion yuan.

Source - Bloomberg
Unlike foreign exchange markets where central banks frequently intervene, the governments strive not to intervene in the stock markets since intervention transmit negative signals and carry market-related side effects.

But when the Chinese market went into a freefall, government announced several measures including interest rate cuts, capping short selling, relaxed rules which allow pension funds and social security funds to invest more in stocks, and allowed people to use their houses as a collateral to borrow money to buy stocks. Most significantly, it used a state-owned securities financing company to lend $42 billion to 21 brokerages so that they could purchase blue-chip stocks.
Government was trying their best to control the market. Why?

The Intervention of government in the stock market to restore the equilibrium

There were two reasons that can be attributed to the government intervention in the market. One is being the sociopolitical considerations and another is being the economic considerations.

Sociopolitical considerations – over the past years, the majority of people who invested in the Chinese market are predominantly retail investors. The various policies taken by the government send a strong signal that in case of any serious downturn, government will come to their rescue. So if investors lose money, it can create a lot serious disturbances in the socio political arena. As a result government has no alternate option, but to intervene in the market.

Economic considerations - Chinese economy is going through a challenging phase. As per the IMF, the growth rate is expected at 6.3 percent in FY16 which is way below the average growth rate of 9.04 percent achieved during the period 1989 to 2015. So Government had to showcase the stability of the financial system or else it can send serious negative sentiments around the globe which may deteriorate the current macro environment situation further.

Why should we care?

Globalization and technological advancement acted as a reason to expand the breadth and depth of the financial markets and allowed them to work in a highly interconnected mode. The main fallacy of this is that even a small disruption in one market can send very serious repercussions across the globe.

Consider the following graph that shows the movement of CNX Nifty and SSE Composite index from 01-June-2015 to 31-July-2015.


One thing which can be observed from this graph is that the Indian market was highly volatile during this period and a significant part can be attributed to the issues in china. The average Volatility index (VIX) for this period was 16.34 which was greater than the 30 days and 200 days moving average of 15.88 and 16.20 respectively.

What Policymakers have to do?

The Chinese problem is not the only example of the preposterous policies taken by the government focusing only on the short term rewards and benefits. We have observed many of these kinds of policies in the past. 1997 Asian financial crisis to the US subprime mortgage crisis to the current euro zone crisis has something to say regarding this. Many can argue that the size of the China's stock market is not as big, relative to the Chinese economy. So the economic implications are not that systemic in nature. But that is not an excuse for policy makers in taking imprudent decisions.

So what we need in the long run is a rule based predictable and sustainable monetary and financial arrangements. But unfortunately policy makers across the globe haven’t done enough thinking on that and the current monetary policy practices focus mainly on the short term benefits. As a result it exposes substantial risk to the global economy. As the honorable governor of the RBI, Raghuram Rajan pointed out in his speech at the Economic Club of New York; “we are being pushed towards competitive monetary easing. But what we need are stronger, well-capitalized multilateral institutions with widespread legitimacy. In order to build such institutions we need global co-operation and participation from the policy makers. Only by creating these types of institutions we can absorb the possible future and a stable and create a predictable financial system.”

Regards,
Harikrishnan
Views are personal :)

References

IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE - A Wonderful book by Mr. Robert Shiller


Irrational exuberance is a phrase used by the then Federal Reserve board chairman Alen Greenspan during the dot com bubble of the 1990s. Mr. Robert Shiller, the Nobel prize winning Yale university professor published a book called “Irrational Exuberance” in March 2000, at the peak of dot com boom. This book clearly states how the markets are overvalued and the various reasons for such euphoria.

The book has mainly divided into 5 parts.

Before beginning the part 1, the author makes a clear statement that the US market is highly valued compared to any other time in history by taking various analogies. Author mentions that stock markets are not obeying the fundamentals of stock pricing and explains the various reasons for that in the coming chapters.

Part 1 (structural factors)

Part 1 explains the structural factors. The author explains 12 main factors which played a major role in shaping the valuations of stocks. The next chapter further explains the Amplification mechanism involving the investor expectations. Mr. Shiller mentions that there is a feedback loop working in the stock market and this has a cascading effect on the market as a whole.

Part 2 (cultural factors)

In part 2, the author explains the role of media and New era economic thinking in shaping speculative bubbles. Mr. Shiller says that big stock price changes not necessarily following big news events by taking several examples. The author believes that the news stories are usually tagged along after a crash or boom. Shiller argues that bubbles can only occur if there is similar thinking among large groups of people. The media helps make this happen.
The next chapters explains about how New Era economic thinking that is the high level of expectations about the future technological innovations helped market to reach high levels without giving any importance to fundamental valuations.  These types of thinking were present in almost every part of the world, Shiller argues.

Part 3 (Psychological factors)

Mr. Shiller argues that there are definitely many psychological factors behind this exuberance and says that investors are following a herd like behavior. Mr. Shiller mentions that people do not have fully independent judgment and there is an immense power of social pressure on individual judgment. Even completely rational people too took part in herd behavior even if they know that everyone else is behaving like a herd.

Part 4 (Attempts to rationalize exuberance)

Mr. Shiller argues that several theories such as “efficient market hypothesis” and “random walk theory” tries to rationalize this stock boom. But by taking numerous examples the author proves that mispricing still exists in the market. He also defeats the arguments such as earnings changes and price changes, dividend changes and price changes go hand in hand.
Another attempt to rationalize this exuberance was associated with investor intelligence. There were theories that public at large learned that the long term value of the market is really greater that they had thought and as a result they are paying higher prices because they learned that in the long run stocks always outperform bonds. But Mr. Shiller completely disagrees with this statement. The chapter says that there is no evidence that stock market will always outperform bonds over the long term. Mr. Shiller adds that public has not learned fundamental truth, instead their attention was shifted from some fundamental truths.

Part 5 (A call to action)

Mr. Shiller argues that a lot of possible new factors both supportive and destructive of market values will emerge and investors have to be very careful in stock market. The author concludes the chapter by giving several suggestions about what individuals and as a society should do in maintaining the market fundamentals.